Epidemiological pattern, incidence, and outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in immunocompromised patients are a matter of debate. METHODS: We performed a prospective nationwide study including a consecutive cohort of liver transplant patients with COVID-19 recruited during the Spanish outbreak from 28 February to 7 April, 2020. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as the need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care, and/or death. Age- and gender-standardised incidence and mortality ratios (SIR and SMR) were calculated using data from the Ministry of Health and the Spanish liver transplant registry. Independent predictors of severe COVID-19 among hospitalised patients were analysed using multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 111 liver transplant patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (SIR = 191.2 [95% CI 190.3-192.2]). The epidemiological curve and geographic distribution overlapped widely between the liver transplant and general populations. After a median follow-up of 23 days, 96 patients (86.5%) were admitted to hospital and 22 patients (19.8%) required respiratory support. A total of 12 patients were admitted to the ICU (10.8%). The mortality rate was 18%, which was lower than in the matched general population (SMR = 95.5 [95% CI 94.2-96.8]). Overall, 35 patients (31.5%) met criteria of severe COVID-19. Baseline immunosuppression containing mycophenolate was an independent predictor of severe COVID-19 (relative risk = 3.94; 95% CI 1.59-9.74; p = 0.003), particularly at doses higher than 1,000 mg/day (p = 0.003). This deleterious effect was not observed with calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus and complete immunosuppression withdrawal showed no benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Being chronically immunosuppressed, liver transplant patients have an increased risk of acquiring COVID-19 but their mortality rates are lower than the matched general population. Upon hospital admission, mycophenolate dose reduction or withdrawal could help in preventing severe COVID-19. However, complete immunosuppression withdrawal should be discouraged. LAY SUMMARY: In liver transplant patients, chronic immunosuppression increases the risk of acquiring COVID-19 but it could reduce disease severity. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal may not be justified. However, mycophenolate withdrawal or temporary conversion to calcineurin inhibitors or everolimus until disease resolution could be beneficial in hospitalised patients.

The ART-SCORE is not an effective tool for optimizing patient selection for DEB-TACE retreatment. A multicentre Spanish study / El ART-SCORE no es una herramienta eficaz para optimizar la selección de pacientes para el tratamiento con DEB-TACE. Estudio multicéntrico español

Introduction: The appropriate selection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are eligible for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains a challenge. The ART score has recently been proposed as a method of identifying patients who are eligible or not for a second TACE procedure. Objective: To assess the validity of the Assessment for Retreatment with TACE (ART) score in a cohort of patients treated with drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE). Secondary objective: to identify clinical determinants associated with overall survival (OS). Method: A retrospective, multicentre study conducted in Spain in patients with HCC having undergone two or more DEB-TACE procedures between January 2009 and December 2014. The clinical characteristics and OS from the day before the second DEB-TACE of patients with a high ART score (ART≥2.5) and a low ART score (ART 0-1) were compared. Risk factors for mortality were identified using Cox's proportional hazards model. Results: Of the 102 patients included, 51 scored 0-1.5 and 51 scored ≥2.5. Hepatitis C was more frequent in patients scoring ≥2.5. Median OS from the day before the second DEB-TACE was 21 months (95% CI, 15-28) in the group scoring 0-1.5, and 17 months (95% CI, 10-25) in the group scoring ≥2.5 (P=0.3562). Platelet count and tumour size, but not the ART score, were independent baseline predictors of OS. Conclusions: The ART score is not suitable for guiding DEB-TACE retreatment according to Spanish clinical practice standards (AU)

Introducción: La selección de los candidatos ideales con carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC) que más se benefician de realizar quimioembolización transarterial (TACE) sigue siendo un reto. Recientemente se ha propuesto el índice ART para seleccionar a aquellos pacientes tributarios o no de realizar un segundo procedimiento de TACE. Objetivo: Evaluar la validez del índice ART en una cohorte tratada con TACE con partículas cargadas (DEB-TACE). Objetivo secundario: identificar los factores clínicos asociados con la supervivencia global. Método: Estudio retrospectivo multicéntrico español en pacientes con CHC tratados con≥2 DEB-TACE entre enero del 2009 y diciembre del 2014. Se compararon las características clínicas y la supervivencia global desde el día previo a la segunda DEB-TACE entre los pacientes con ART alto (ART≥2,5) y bajo (ART 0-1). Los factores de riesgo de mortalidad se identificaron usando el modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox. Resultados: De los 102 pacientes incluidos, 51 obtuvieron puntuación de 0-1,5 y 51 ≥ 2,5. La hepatitis C fue más frecuente en pacientes con puntuación ≥ 2,5. La supervivencia global mediana desde el día previo a DEB-TACE-2 fue de 21 meses (IC del 95%, 15-28) y de 17 meses (IC del 95%, 10-25) en los pacientes con ART 0-1,5 y ≥ 2,5, respectivamente (p=0,3562). Los factores basales predictores independientes de supervivencia fueron el recuento de plaquetas y el tamaño del tumor, pero no el índice ART. Conclusiones: El índice ART no es adecuado para guiar el retratamiento con DEB-TACE según los estándares de práctica clínica español (AU)

The ART-SCORE is not an effective tool for optimizing patient selection for DEB-TACE retreatment. A multicentre Spanish study.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate selection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are eligible for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains a challenge. The ART score has recently been proposed as a method of identifying patients who are eligible or not for a second TACE procedure. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of the Assessment for Retreatment with TACE (ART) score in a cohort of patients treated with drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: to identify clinical determinants associated with overall survival (OS). METHOD: A retrospective, multicentre study conducted in Spain in patients with HCC having undergone two or more DEB-TACE procedures between January 2009 and December 2014. The clinical characteristics and OS from the day before the second DEB-TACE of patients with a high ART score (ART≥2.5) and a low ART score (ART 0-1) were compared. Risk factors for mortality were identified using Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients included, 51 scored 0-1.5 and 51 scored ≥2.5. Hepatitis C was more frequent in patients scoring ≥2.5. Median OS from the day before the second DEB-TACE was 21 months (95% CI, 15-28) in the group scoring 0-1.5, and 17 months (95% CI, 10-25) in the group scoring ≥2.5 (P=0.3562). Platelet count and tumour size, but not the ART score, were independent baseline predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: The ART score is not suitable for guiding DEB-TACE retreatment according to Spanish clinical practice standards.